Friday, November 16, 2007

way beyond words

Not everything has a name. Some things lead us into realms beyond words. —Alexander Solzhenitsyn

Skepticism really is the mode of the day. I didn't like admitting this at first, because I have found myself somewhat more skeptical lately, especially of pulpits and all that they bring with them. But I've just finished a book called The Myth of Certainty and the author, Daniel Taylor, suggests “that among the things one should be skeptical about in our skeptical age” is skepticism itself.

We all know doubters—people who can find the massive black cloud in the middle of every silver lining. But are these people the clowns diverting our attention from the cowboy riding the one ton bull? Are they really all part of the same show?

There is a way of approaching things that is basically a glorified doubting game. A way of defending everything, proving everything, setting up every conversation or statement as an argument, cornering the truth.

Taylor says that behind all this “the person playing the doubting game is afraid of looking foolish, of not appearing logical, rigorous, and disciplined”. And that’s probably most of it. Nobody wants to be debunked or ridiculed. And deeper than that, nobody wants to find out someday that their whole life was meaningless. So what do you do? You play defense. You talk to yourself in the mirror. The man in that glass becomes your detractor, your doubter, your antagonist.

But you can’t corner the truth. You can’t trap it in the mirror. Not everything has a name.

One benefit of release from the monopoly of the doubting game is the awareness that a belief, feeling, intuition, or conviction does not have to be “defendable” to be worthwhile. Solzhenitsyn says, “Not everything has a name.” Likewise, not everything is explainable. Not everything can be put in terms that allow it to be ground through the doubting game machine. Even the concepts of explanation, defense, and proof are derived from one particular way of looking at the world which, while powerful and historically productive, has no valid claim to exclusive rule. Again, this is not an apology for anti-intellectualism or irrationalism, but a recognition that the search for truth is too important to limit ourselves to one faculty or one methodology. —Daniel Taylor, Myth of Certainty

This is all stuff so familiar to me. God rescued me from wanting to be right two and a half years ago. He painted the picture vividly. But I would add this as a word to the wise. Don’t expect everyone to accept your escape. Expect to be called irresponsible when you stop defending yourself. Expect to be accused of jeopardizing those around you when you don’t lock all the doors and arm the alarm. Expect to be ignored when you stop arguing. And don’t expect that if you lay down your weapons that a cease fire will happen. Smiles can be wiped off. Glass can be shattered.

But please escape. We need you to escape. We need you to stop defending yourself and get back to being yourself. We need creativity—stories, music, adventures, ideas, humor, painting, photography, philosophy. We need healing and restoration—causes, gifts, breakfast. “And aside from controversial things,” as Taylor says, “tasks accomplished which have nothing to do with partisanship of any kind, simply because we are human beings whom God has given many, many things to do.”

There is so much to life than cannot be defended or explained. There is another way.

3 comments:

Jon said...

Yes, yes, yes.

Has it really been two and a half years?

Jesus never tried to prove himself. He just WAS himself.

His methodology wasn't the way of doubt. Nor was it the way of "certainty." (Both of those are very useful mental states which are good for knowing when and how hard to brush your teeth. But they're not good for much more than that.)

What Jesus taught was the way of life, the way of light, the way of truth.

... and His primary teaching method: story. Either the telling or the living thereof.

Steve Coan said...

It has been two and a half years.

That's a long time to wander, no? But then

  All that is gold does not glitter
  Not all those who wander are lost

I laughed out loud when I thought about Jesus deciding when and how hard to brush his teeth.

But there you go again with all that STORY talk. How can you elevate story so high? Are you saying that Jesus didn't teach how to figure out who was right and who was wrong and how to correct each situation? Are you saying that Jesus didn't teach us with the intent of eliminating ambiguity? Are you saying Jesus didn't have any interest in being the Bible Answer Man? Well if that's true I want to know why he spent all that time writing it down for us in no uncertain terms. I mean, if he wasn't so concerned about us "rightly dividing the scriptures", wouldn't he have spent more of his time out with the people--healing them, telling them stories, walking on water, partying, eating, drinking, defending the weak, feeding the hungry, changing the weather?

sam said...

one more instance where the conclusion is actually the beginning.

There just isn't a list to get through is there?

This song is resonating with me. It's in my heart and has found my voice. I admit to being a Christina Perry fan. I've been known to...